Most discussion of healthcare AI focuses on public health settings. Large health services, teaching hospitals, government-funded research. Private hospitals operate in a different context that shapes AI strategy differently.

Having advised both public and private healthcare organisations on AI, I’ve observed distinct patterns. Here’s what private hospital leaders should consider.

How Private Hospital Context Differs

Several factors distinguish private hospitals:

Business Model

Private hospitals operate commercially. They need to:

• Attract patients and referring clinicians
• Manage costs to maintain margins
• Compete with other private and public options
• Satisfy private health insurers
• Generate returns for owners/shareholders

AI investments need business cases, not just clinical cases.

Clinician Relationships

Private hospitals don’t employ most of their doctors. VMOs (visiting medical officers) choose where to practice and bring patients with them. The hospital provides infrastructure; clinicians provide patients.

This creates a different dynamic for AI adoption. You can’t mandate that clinicians use AI. You need to make AI attractive enough that clinicians choose to use it.

Scale

Most private hospitals are smaller than major public health networks. Even large private groups operate as collections of smaller facilities rather than integrated networks.

This affects what AI investments make sense. Scale-dependent AI may not justify cost at individual facility level.

Technology Infrastructure

Private hospital IT environments vary widely. Some are modern and well-integrated; others are fragmented with multiple disconnected systems.

AI implementation complexity depends heavily on existing infrastructure.

Regulatory Environment

TGA requirements apply equally to public and private. But private hospitals may have less internal capability for regulatory navigation and may face different liability considerations.

Strategic Priorities for Private Hospitals

Given this context, where should private hospitals focus AI efforts?

Operational Efficiency

AI that reduces costs or improves throughput:

• Theatre scheduling optimisation
• Bed management and patient flow
• Staffing and rostering optimisation
• Length of stay prediction
• Readmission risk reduction (which affects costs)

These applications have direct financial impact that supports business cases.

Clinician Experience

AI that makes your hospital more attractive to VMOs:

• Documentation tools that save clinician time
• Diagnostic support that enhances clinical decision-making
• Results delivery and communication tools
• Seamless integration with clinician workflows

Clinicians who have better experience at your hospital bring more patients.

Patient Experience

AI that improves patient satisfaction:

• Communication and engagement tools
• Wait time reduction through better scheduling
• Personalised care coordination
• Discharge and follow-up support

Patient experience affects both reputation and insurer relationships.

Competitive Differentiation

AI as a market positioning element:

• Advanced diagnostic capabilities
• Innovative care models
• Technology-forward brand positioning

This matters more for some private hospitals than others, depending on competitive context.

What Works Well in Private Settings

AI applications that tend to succeed in private hospitals:

Administrative AI. Documentation, scheduling, communication tools. Clear efficiency gains, moderate complexity, broad benefit.

Radiology AI. Private radiology groups have been early AI adopters. Clear value proposition, mature products, workflow fit.

Pathology AI. Where private pathology has digitalised, AI adoption follows. Similar dynamics to radiology.

Revenue optimisation. AI for coding accuracy, charge capture, billing efficiency. Direct revenue impact that funds investment.

Patient engagement. Chatbots, appointment management, communication tools. Improved experience with manageable complexity.

What’s Harder in Private Settings

Challenges that are more pronounced in private hospitals:

Scale-dependent AI. AI that requires large volumes to justify cost may not work at individual facility level. Needs group-level investment or partnership approaches.

Clinician adoption. When clinicians aren’t employees, mandating AI use isn’t an option. Adoption depends on genuine value to clinicians.

Integration complexity. Private hospitals often have multiple disconnected systems. AI integration can be more challenging than in integrated public networks.

Investment capacity. Private margins can be thin. Large upfront investments are harder to justify than ongoing operational costs.

Research partnerships. Academic partnerships that fund public hospital AI are less available to private hospitals.

Strategic Recommendations

For private hospital leaders developing AI strategy:

Start With Business Case

Every AI initiative needs a clear business case:

• What’s the financial impact?
• How will we measure return?
• What’s the payback period?
• How does this compare to alternative investments?

Clinical value alone rarely justifies private hospital AI investment. The business case matters.

Focus on Clinician Value

AI that makes clinicians’ work better gets adopted. AI that adds friction gets ignored. Prioritise applications that clinicians genuinely want.

Involve clinicians in AI selection and design. Their buy-in determines success.

Consider Group Approaches

If you’re part of a larger hospital group, consider group-level AI strategy:

• Shared investment across facilities
• Common platforms and vendors
• Centralised expertise and governance
• Scale economics for larger AI investments

Individual facility investment may be less efficient than coordinated group approach.

Build on Existing Infrastructure

AI that integrates with existing systems succeeds more than AI that requires new infrastructure. Assess your current environment and prioritise AI that fits.

If infrastructure is limiting, AI strategy might need to start with infrastructure investment.

Partner Wisely

Private hospitals often lack internal capability for AI evaluation and implementation. External partners can help, but choose carefully.

AI consultants Melbourne and similar firms work with private hospitals, but the engagement model differs from public sector. Focus on commercial outcomes and practical delivery.

Learn From Early Movers

Some private hospitals and groups are further along with AI. Learn from their experience:

• What’s working?
• What mistakes did they make?
• What vendors and products are they using?
• What governance approaches have they developed?

Industry networks and conferences provide opportunities to learn from peers. AI consultants Sydney often facilitate peer learning workshops for private hospital groups, which can accelerate this knowledge sharing.

Governance for Private Hospitals

AI governance in private settings needs to address:

Clinical governance integration. AI governance should connect to existing clinical governance structures. VMO representation in governance matters.

Commercial considerations. Governance needs to include commercial and financial perspectives, not just clinical and technical.

Liability clarity. Private hospitals face liability differently than public. AI governance should address liability considerations explicitly.

Vendor management. With smaller internal teams, vendor relationship management becomes more critical. Governance should include vendor oversight.

Competitive positioning. Governance should consider how AI affects competitive position, not just clinical and operational factors.

Looking Forward

Private hospital AI will develop differently than public hospital AI:

• More focus on efficiency and clinician experience
• More gradual adoption due to scale and investment constraints
• More vendor-dependent given limited internal capability
• More commercially driven in priorities and evaluation

This isn’t better or worse than public sector approaches—it’s appropriate to context.

The private hospitals that succeed with AI will be those that understand their distinctive context and develop strategies that fit it, rather than copying public sector approaches that don’t translate.

---

Dr. Rebecca Liu is a health informatics specialist and former Chief Clinical Information Officer. She advises healthcare organisations on clinical AI strategy and implementation.